mit app inventor
Explainability-Driven Quality Assessment for Rule-Based Systems
Seneviratne, Oshani, Capuzzo, Brendan, Van Woensel, William
This paper introduces an explanation framework designed to enhance the quality of rules in knowledge-based reasoning systems based on dataset-driven insights. The traditional method for rule induction from data typically requires labor-intensive labeling and data-driven learning. This framework provides an alternative and instead allows for the data-driven refinement of existing rules: it generates explanations of rule inferences and leverages human interpretation to refine rules. It leverages four complementary explanation types: trace-based, contextual, contrastive, and counterfactual, providing diverse perspectives for debugging, validating, and ultimately refining rules. By embedding explainability into the reasoning architecture, the framework enables knowledge engineers to address inconsistencies, optimize thresholds, and ensure fairness, transparency, and interpretability in decision-making processes. Its practicality is demonstrated through a use case in finance.
- North America > United States > New York > Rensselaer County > Troy (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Nova Scotia > Halifax Regional Municipality > Halifax (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- (4 more...)
FEAD: Figma-Enhanced App Design Framework for Improving UI/UX in Educational App Development
Designing user-centric mobile applications is increasingly essential in educational technology. However, platforms like MIT App Inventor-one of the world's largest educational app development tools-face inherent limitations in supporting modern UI/UX design. This study introduces the Figma-Enhanced App Design (FEAD) Method, a structured framework that integrates Figma's advanced design tools into MIT App Inventor using an identify-design-implement workflow. Leveraging principles such as the 8-point grid system and Gestalt laws of perception, the FEAD Method empowers users to address design gaps, creating visually appealing, functional, and accessible applications. A comparative evaluation revealed that 61.2% of participants perceived FEAD-enhanced designs as on par with professional apps, compared to just 8.2% for baseline designs. These findings highlight the potential of bridging design with development platforms to enhance app creation, offering a scalable framework for students to master both functional and aesthetic design principles and excel in shaping the future of user-centric technology.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.06)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Fremont (0.04)
Rapid Mobile App Development for Generative AI Agents on MIT App Inventor
Gao, Jaida, Su, Calab, Miller, Etai, Lu, Kevin, Meng, Yu
The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a pivotal force shaping our society, finding applications across diverse domains such as education, sustainability, and safety. Leveraging AI within mobile applications makes it easily accessible to the public, catalyzing its transformative potential. In this paper, we present a methodology for the rapid development of AI agent applications using the development platform provided by MIT App Inventor. To demonstrate its efficacy, we share the development journey of three distinct mobile applications: SynchroNet for fostering sustainable communities; ProductiviTeams for addressing procrastination; and iHELP for enhancing community safety. All three applications seamlessly integrate a spectrum of generative AI features, leveraging OpenAI APIs. Furthermore, we offer insights gleaned from overcoming challenges in integrating diverse tools and AI functionalities, aiming to inspire young developers to join our efforts in building practical AI agent applications.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning > Generative AI (0.91)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.89)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (0.83)